The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the evidence presented by the prosecutor in the gist of the grounds for appeal, even if the defendant sufficiently recognized the fact that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor is insufficient to deem that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim without any reasonable doubt, and the judgment of the court below that the judgment below erred

2. Determination

A. On July 1, 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, such as committing an indecent act on the part of the victim D, who was seated next to a bus in Seoul, a means of public transportation in the vicinity of the Gyeongdo Highway which passed through the Gu and Si around July 23:17, 2013, where the Defendant was able to drive in the vicinity of the Gyeongdo Highway.

B. The lower court determined as follows, based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, found the Defendant not guilty of the Defendant on the ground that: (a) at the time when an indecent act was committed; (b) at the time when the Defendant was committed, the Defendant got a cell phone with the Defendant’s cell phone; and (c) the Defendant stated that an express bus driver, who was driving at the front of the Defendant and the victim at the time, got a cell phone lusium; and (d) the Defendant appears to have taken a seat seat seat on the express bus after drinking; and (e) it appears that the Defendant was faced with the Defendant’s cell phone with the Defendant’s cell phone lusium, who was under the influence of alcohol, was aware of the possibility that the Defendant was not guilty of the Defendant’s chest by taking the Defendant’s right hand over while he was trying to take the cell phone in front of the Defendant’s cell phone.

C. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below's judgment was adopted.