logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.07.22 2016고단1099
사기등
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months for each crime of fraud, and the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On September 19, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspended execution at the Seoul Central District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on September 27, 2014.

[2] On January 22, 2016, at around 23:10 on January 22, 2016, the Defendant driven a Cbenz car without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 200 meters section from the front side of the office building located in Busan metropolitan Daegu, Busan, to the front side of the entrance of the office building located in the same Dong.

[2016 Highest 1099]

1. On June 2012, the Defendant: (a) from the “E” car page 1 located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim F is the victim F with the “stock investment case with the KRW 200 million unit; and (b) the monthly profit would be 20% of the amount invested if the old account was returned, and there is no loss.

If 50,000,000 won was added to 150,000 won, and if 50,000,000 won was invested, 10% out of 20% of the monthly profit-making investment amount may be deducted, and the remaining money may be brought to the profit.

“.............”

However, even if the defendant received the above money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to pay 10% of the amount invested every month to the injured party as profit by making a stock investment, since he only intended to use it for the purpose other than the purpose of stock investment such as living expenses.

On July 12, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 46 million from the damaged party to the account of a national bank account in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant.

2. The Defendant, at the G office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around September 2012, at around that time, purchased a vehicle at a sprink with the victim F, who started the business of the above G around that time and needed a business vehicle. The Defendant would purchase a vehicle at a sprink with the victim F, who is in need of a business vehicle.

“........”

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the injured party, he only thought that he would use it for any purpose other than the purchase of passenger cars such as living expenses.

arrow