logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.10.14 2013고단6899
사기
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months for each crime set forth in the judgment of the defendant, and a fine of 10 million won for the remaining crimes.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on December 7, 201, and the judgment was finalized on June 28, 2012, and the term of imprisonment terminated on October 11, 2013.

"2013 Highest 6899"

1. Although the Defendant borrowed money to the victim even if he/she did not have the intent or ability to complete payment, the Defendant obtained money from the victim C with the victim’s false statement that “it is necessary to pay money” on August 25, 201 and received KRW 8 million on August 26, 201 and KRW 10 million on August 26, 201.

"2016 Highest 2283"

2. On July 20, 2015, the Defendant issued the victim E’s “Dau F” operated by the victim E in the wife population D, and the victim E, who became aware of a number of times as a customer in the car page, stated that “I would be able to enable a partner who has a well-being of stock investment to make an investment, and if you receive money, I would be able to obtain high profits within one month.”

However, in fact, the defendant received money from the victim and did not have the intent or ability to obtain high profits from the victim, even if he received money from the victim, even if he did not receive such money.

On July 28, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the victim as a stock investment deposit account in the name of the Defendant.

3. On August 6, 2015, the Defendant, at the place indicated in Paragraph 1 of Article 2015, stated that “The Defendant would allow the victims E to make an equity investment, and return the money more than two months thereafter.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not intend to use the cosmetic business with money from the victim, so even if receiving the said money from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to make the victim gain high profits by using it as a means of stock investment.

The defendant is against the victim on August 2015.

arrow