The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) was known that the Defendant was the victim in front of the bus that he was driving, but the bus stops in the future about 30 cm since he was driving to move about the damage to other vehicles at the bus stops. Therefore, there was no intention to shock the victim by the bus that he was driving. The Defendant asserts that he was faced with the bus that he was driving and suffered the injury.

2. The judgment of the court below comprehensively based on the evidence duly adopted and examined, i.e., ① the Defendant was driving on the D Road at Kimpo-si on July 6, 2013 as a village bus driver around Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si. However, the victim resisted the Defendant’s rapid change from the secondary line to the primary line, and obstructed the Defendant’s bus stop at his bus stop at the bus stop after getting out of the bus and getting out of the bus at his own bus, ② even though the Defendant was unclaimed by the victim, the victim continued to stop in the bus, obstructed the Defendant’s bus heading, obstructed the Defendant’s bus front, and the Defendant started a little rear bus, but the Defendant was facing the right shoulder part of the bus due to the Defendant’s failure to avoid it, ③ The victim’s statement is specific and consistent, and the CCTV, video image, video, and video at the time, and so on, it is difficult to accept the Defendant’s argument that there was an intentional shock of the Defendant’s crime against the victim.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.