logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.12.24 2014고정2739
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a restaurant with a trade name of about 75 square meters in Gyeongbuk-gun B.

No person who sells or provides agricultural products or processed agricultural products after cooking shall make a false indication of the place of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion as to the place of origin.

Nevertheless, around August 20, 2014, the Defendant purchased at 2,200 won per 2,200 won a total of 10 sugars made of imported beef from Damat-si Dat-si (Dat-si) and sold them after cooking at 7,000 won for food calculing, calculing, and selling them at 7,00 won for food calculing, calculing, and selling them with false indication of origin on beef.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site confirmation, evidence of violation of origin, photographs of business registration certificate, and application of statutes;

1. Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that there are circumstances to consider the circumstances of the crime, such as the confession of the fact of the crime, the violation of his mistake, the scale of the business, the small scale of the business, etc., and the lack of any previous punishment, and the defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing factors indicated in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime.

arrow