logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.23 2018나59182
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants is revoked, and that part is against the Defendants.

Reasons

1. On September 30, 200, Nonparty D’s husband acquired ownership of E apartment building F, G, and H (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) at the reasonable Cheongju-dong E apartment building, an aggregate building on September 30, 209: (i) the ownership of the instant building was 837m2; (ii) the Plaintiff and D’s stores were located in the instant commercial building by taking an amount of KRW 8.5 million around October 2009 into the gas boiler, conditioning machine, measuring instrument, and gas pipeline; and (iii) the Plaintiff and D’s stores were located in the instant commercial building as an alternative auction of KRW 50,000 (hereinafter “the instant commercial building”). However, the Plaintiff and D’s stores were still located in the instant commercial building as an alternative auction of KRW 50,000,000,000,000 from KRW 58,000,000,000,000,000.

arrow