Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2012, at around 16:24, the Defendant boarded the “C” bus belonging to the Jeju passenger who operates from the Jeju bus terminal to Seopo-si.

At around 16:45 on July 2, 2012, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by inserting his hand with the front seat and the windows, and by holding them up on the front seat, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim on the right chest of the victim D (n, 22 years old).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, USB cameras, investigation reports (indecent acts by force) by capturing CCTV images;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 298 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: To the extent that a fine is imposed on a defendant who has committed a sexual crime of judgment as to whether to impose an order to complete a program under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, in principle, the order to complete a program should be imposed, but the summary order in this case did not impose an order to complete a program on the defendant and only the defendant applied for formal trial. As such, the defendant does not impose an order to complete a program pursuant to the principle of prohibition against disadvantageous alteration under Article 457-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act (see Supreme Court Decision 2012Do8736, Sept. 27, 2012). Where this judgment to submit personal information becomes final and conclusive, the defendant becomes a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes

The age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type, motive, process and seriousness of the crime in this case, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the defendant's entrance due to the disclosure order or notification order, and the preventive effect of the sexual crime subject to registration which can be achieved due to such order.