logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.10.11 2018고단279
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 2018, the Defendant posted a letter as if he/she sold Internet game money, cellular phone, etc. on the Internet website at around 2018, and thought that he/she would receive the payment from the victims.

On February 27, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter on the Internet game site “Stop M”, which is an online game site on February 27, 2018, and made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would send money first to the victim who read and contacted the letter, and the Defendant would send money to the Matop M.

However, the defendant did not have the ability or will to send the game money even if he has received the money from the damaged person.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 70,000 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (E) account in the name of D as the price for the game money on the same day from the victim, as well as by the above method from around that time to June 2, 2018, the victims were enticed over 33 times in total as shown in the annexed crime list, and received KRW 6,184,900.

"2018 Highest 374" Defendant posted a letter as if he were to sell mobile phones, online game money, etc. on the Internet bulletin board, and attempted to obtain money from victims and obtain money from them.

On May 19, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter on the “GPC room” located in the PP room in the PP room in the PP room in the PP room of the PP room of the PP room of the PP room of the PP room of the PP room of the PP room of the PP bank, and made a false statement that the PP phone sales of PP 7 PP mobile phones will be forwarded money to H by the victim H who reported and contacted the text.

However, even if the defendant has received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the ability or intent to send the cell phone.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and 350,000 won under the name of the defendant as the mobile phone price for the same day from the victim.

arrow