logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.05.09 2013가합1816
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants: (a) KRW 480,420,00 for each Plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 3, 2014 to May 9, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ relevant Plaintiff is a subsidiary company of Hong Kong (A; hereinafter “ Hong Kong head office”) that operates the development and sale of digital communications networks and software. Defendant B was a person who served as the Plaintiff’s representative director from September 2007 to December 2, 201, and Defendant C is a person who served as the Plaintiff’s managing director from January 201 to January 201.

B. 1) Co., Ltd. D (hereinafter “D”)

on October 25, 2010, E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”)

(1) The Tracard (OKBO, hereinafter referred to as the “instant product”).

(AT separately): The contract amount is as follows: 135,200,000 won: 10% of the price for the goods at the time of the order: the unit price for the goods: 4,500 won/(VT separately): 30,000 won: October 25, 2010 - March 25, 2011; the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the supply of the goods of this case from D on October 26, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as “the first contract”) and the main contents are as follows.

Contract amount: 360,000,000 won for the settlement method of 360,000 won for the goods: 100% for the goods: 12,000 won for the goods: 30,000 won for the goods: 30,000 contract amount: October 26, 2010 to 25, the Plaintiff entered into a contract to supply the goods of this case on the same day, and its main contents are as follows: 432,00,000 won for the goods of this case: 10% for the goods of this case within seven days after the delivery of the goods: 30,000 won for the goods of this case: 30,000 won for the goods of this case: 20,000 won for the goods of this case: 30,000 won for the goods of this case: 30,000 won for the goods of this case: 20,000 won for the goods of this case, the Plaintiff did not pay the goods of this case on March 25, 2015,201.

C. 1D does not entirely perform the delivery obligation under the primary contract.

arrow