1. The plaintiff A and the defendant's appeal are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows. The defendant's assertion in the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the additional determination as to the contents of the defendant's assertion in the court of first instance as follows 2. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil

【Matters to be removed or added】 On the 3rd judgment of the first instance court, the 5th judgment “7,640,000 won” shall be read as “8,640,000 won”.

The 4th page 13 "Plaintiffs" shall be deemed to be "Plaintiff A".

Part 4 "Agreement 14" and "the Agreement" (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement in this case") shall be added.

On the 6th 8th 8th , “it shall be liable to compensate for damages,” the following is added: “The 5th 1, 2, and 6th 6th ,” and the result of the first instance court’s physical examination on the head of the Seoul Escartoon Hospital, which alone exceeds the limit of liability insurance, and there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the damages incurred to the Plaintiff A exceed the limit of liability insurance and exceeds the scope of compensation under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.”

2. The defendant asserts that it cannot accept the claim of consolation money of the plaintiff B, C, and D, as well as consolation money of the plaintiff B, C, and D, and that the defendant cannot accept the claim of consolation money of the plaintiff B, C, and D. However, there is no evidence to deem that the plaintiff B, C, and D was agreed at the time of the agreement of this case, and the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the appeal by the plaintiff A and the defendant is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.