logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.29 2018나2001832
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. As to this part of the basic facts, this Court cited this part of the basic facts in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, given that the part of “1. Basic Facts” (Articles 9 through 5, 8) of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows:

In addition, the part of the judgment of the first instance court in the third page of the judgment was “............., the part in the judgment of the first instance was “......................, the part in the judgment of the first instance was “........”

The first instance court's judgment No. 3 was confirmed "..........." was confirmed "," and it was prescribed that the Switzerland 81mg should be recovered once a day, and for a total of 28 days."

In the first instance court's decision, the first instance court held that "the Yutopar (or Yutopar Hel) and the stoke (Ceftezogle), which are antibioticic agents, began to set forth the amount of water and set up the Yutopar (or Yutop) which is an antibioticic agents," in the first instance court's 11 to 12.

The following shall be added to the 4th judgment of the first instance court, the 17th judgment of the first instance.

【The medical professionals invested the Plaintiff B’s beta-man, a sub-patomon, in the period of his hospitalization at the F University Hospital. The following is added to the first instance court’s 4th judgment of the first instance court, “the Plaintiff transferred to the Plaintiff.”

【G Hospital medical personnel confirmed the result of training by implementing the Nitrazine test, one of the methods of confirming early fladine with respect to Plaintiff B on the same day, and diagnosed Plaintiff B as the early fladder fladder fladder fladder fladine (PPRM) on the same day, and finally diagnosed Plaintiff B on the same day. [Grounds for Recognition] The overall purport of the dispute (based on Recognition] set forth in Articles 1 through 4, 7 through 9, 14, 16, 1, 7, 9, 1, 1, 1, 7, 9, 1, 1, 1, 5, 1, 5, 1, 5, 5, 1, 5, 5, 5, 1, 5, 5, 5, 5,

arrow