logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고정886
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as a Grade 6 of visual disability, has a life certificate issued by the president of the Korea Franchi Association, and operated D in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office C Building 505-1.

When a defendant conducts a bedy or conducts a bedy, he/she has a duty to pay attention to prevent infection of germs during the course of performing a bedying procedure by properly disinfecting the relevant part and maintaining the environment of fralty.

Nevertheless, on March 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) in the course of crypting the victim E (65 years of age) to the part, etc. of the victim E (65); and (b) in the course of crypting the part of the procedure, the Defendant did not properly disinfect the part of the procedure; and (c) caused injury to the victim of the crypted chrogen salt after the need for approximately three weeks of cryptive chrosium infection.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court (three-time public trial);

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each investigation report (applicable to Acts and subordinate statutes 14, 15, 18, 20, 22) at a net time;

1. Relevant Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant did not have any profit gained by the instant crime, and the Defendant appears to have discontinued his/her business, and that it did not agree with the victim of the bodily injury resulting from his/her occupational and practical injury, but it appears that it would be possible to recover damage suffered by the victim through civil procedure, and that the Defendant did not have any criminal record since 37 years ago.

arrow