A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a victim B (n, 59 years of age) and a relationship with the victim B.

On September 13, 2017, from around 06:00 on September 13, 2017 to around 10:50 on the same day, the Defendant intruded the victim’s residence with the second floor through the victim’s residential gate located in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. A written opinion, the place of the offender, the arrest report of the occurrence of the case, the field photograph, and the list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting investigation results;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the nature and circumstances of the crime are not good in that it repeats the crime even though there are many criminal records, such as damage of the reason, injury, and assault, etc. of the sentencing of the provisional payment order, the punishment is determined as ordered by taking account of the following factors: (a) the victim’s desire to have the Defendant’s prior wife; and (b) the sentencing conditions stated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, background of the crime, circumstance before

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. The Defendant is a relationship between the victim B (n, 59 years of age) and the victim’s relationship.

The defendant, on September 13, 2017, from around 06:00 to around 10:50 the same day, does not open the victim's door in the residence of the victim in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, from around September 13, 2017 to around 10:50 of the same day.

The death of the dead body in the same year and in the same eye shall be discarded.

C. C.S. d. D. D. D. the daily cafeteria could not attend the restaurant, and intimidation.

2. The judgment of the court below is a crime stipulated in Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and constitutes a crime of non-violation of will pursuant to Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the injured person on October 10, 2017, which was following the institution of the instant indictment, expressed his/her intention not to punish the accused. Thus, the accused is in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.