logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.12 2018고단3437
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a relation with a person living together with the victim C.

1. 재물 손괴 피고인은 2018. 9. 22. 01:00 경 대전 중구 D에 있는 피해자의 주거에서 피고인과 다툰 피해자가 현관문 비밀번호를 변경하자 이에 화가 나, 피해자에게 “ 씨발 년 아, 비밀번호를 왜 바꿨냐.

Neither n's death nor n't.

The report shall be dead if it is known.

" ............. ..... ...... ........... 6 of the maizes by gathering 6 of the macele, broken a gale, gale of the gale, b

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the unconfising of the market price, which is the property owned by the victim, and the glass window equivalent to KRW 120,000,00.

2. The Defendant who destroyed a special property was involved in the Daejeon Central Police Station as a result of the crime referred to in paragraph 1, and was released on September 22, 2018, and thereafter found the Defendant again in the residence of the victim as described in paragraph 1 at around 15:50 on September 22, 2018.

Although the victim refers to ".......", the victim will not open the door, but will see the opening and die.

The term "" refers to the stone, which is a dangerous object in the foregoing dwelling unit, and the flag of the suspender's view and the glass.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and damaged the unsatisfy and free will of the market price, which is the property of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each site and damaged photographs;

1. Article 369 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the aggravated period of repeated crime, and it is disadvantageous that there are many kinds of records of violent crime.

However, victims are expected to marry with the defendant, and appeal for the wife, and the degree of damage to property is significant.

arrow