1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A’s labor relationship 1) Plaintiff A’s C&A around March 2000 (hereinafter “C&A”)

) From March 200 to March 1, 200, the Plaintiff, who was employed as assistant instructors of the D University, was directly engaged in the work of arranging documents and ordering documents from D University administrative graduate schools to take charge of high-level policy courses. As indicated below, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract nine times in total, including the temporary agency work of D University No. 3. From March 200 to February 2002, 200, directly employed 2 D University No. 190 to February 2002, 200-6 high-level administrative graduate school’s employment policy courses of 0-6.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.206-3.2.2.2.206-3.2.2.2.2.206-3.2.2.206-3.2.5.20-6.2.205.

3) Upon citing the Plaintiff’s application for remedy filed by the Plaintiff A, the Institute filed an application for review with the National Labor Relations Commission, and the application for review was dismissed, the Institute filed a lawsuit against the Chairperson of the National Labor Relations Commission for cancellation of the trial tribunal on unfair dismissal remedy (Seoul Administrative Court Decision 201Guhap12030, October 20, 201).