A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:15 on September 15, 2016, the Defendant was drinking in front of a permanent elementary school located in a permanent permanent permanent Dong at around 22:01 on the same day at the D District Office of the Permanent Police Station D, which was permanently residing in C, and asked questions about personal information E from the circumstances belonging to the said District E while working in the situation at the time when he was accompanied to the said District, and the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties by the police officer concerning the police officer’s work on the ground that: (a) the Defendant attempted to threaten the above E’s face where he continues to keep his desire to drink, spam and sprink, and sprinke the right-hand river of the E, thereby obstructing the police officer’s proper performance of public duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to internal investigation reports and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1));

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act or more;