logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.11.28 2017고단1323
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From April 17, 2017, the Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the condition that deposit is paid in KRW 2 million and monthly rent of KRW 2 million to D, who operates a sexual traffic business establishment, from around Anyang-gu B and the third floor of the building in Ansan-si.

On May 1, 2017, the Defendant reported commercial sex acts Internet advertisements at the above businesses around 20:00, the Defendant received 90,000 won from male customers E, and provided guidance to female employees F so that they may have sexual intercourse, and around 20:05 on the same day, the Defendant provided guidance to female employees H by receiving 160,000 won from male customers G and having them do sexual intercourse, and provided guidance to the above smuggling so that female employees H would have sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of G, E, F, and H;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The relevant criminal facts, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Sexual Traffic, the reason for imposing the sentence of imprisonment [the scope of the punishment recommended according to the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area (one month to one year and four months) of the types of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older, including the brokerage of sexual traffic, etc. (the brokerage of sexual traffic by business or receipt of consideration, etc.) - There is no special person subject to sentencing (the decision of sentence] - The circumstances favorable to the defendant: The defendant's mistake is recognized - Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for four months and one year and one year, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on October 15, 2016, and the crime of this case was committed during the suspended sentence period.

arrow