A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2015, the security guards C and the assistant policemen C were sent to the road in front of the “F cafeteria” located in the Sungsung-si E, the site, after receiving a report from around 22:20 on March 29, 2015.

The Defendant tried to investigate the circumstances against the parties involved C and D, and expressed C and D expressed that “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ACT Y Y Y YY YY YY YY YY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and C

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] In the event that the degree of special mitigation (one to eight months) (special mitigation) (special mitigation) assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the violation of punishment [decision of sentence] together with the above special mitigation (decision of sentence], the defendant reflects the defendant, the police officers concerned are not subject to punishment, the police officers concerned are not subject to punishment, and there are many criminal records of violence but are not subject to punishment exceeding fines.