1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 1, 2005, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on November 6, 2012 by the rank of the Army Corps in the Army and was discharged from military service on the part of Captain.

B. On March 18, 2015, the Defendant issued the instant public notice of the 56th public notice of the selection test for a person in charge of A’s affairs (hereinafter “the instant public notice”) with the following content as follows.

2. Qualifications for application;

(a) the number of applicants simultaneously;

(b) Ranks eligible for application;

(c) Period of application: Persons discharged from active service, July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015;

(d) Grounds for disqualification: The person falling under Article 33 of the State Public Officials Act shall not receive the application;

3. Test methods;

(a) The first examination: Documentary examination, physical strength examination, and interview;

(b) The second written examination: An evaluation summary of a written examination, physical examination, performance in active duty service, etc. 1): An evaluation summary of a score of examination, only for those who have passed the physical examination), and an evaluation summary of a score of examination, including a score of 40 points 15 point 15 point 15 point 15 point 5 point 5 point 5 point 5 point 3 of the Framework Act on the Establishment of United Defense Reserve Forces for the Establishment of United Nations Forces for Armed Forces under the Framework Act on the Management of Resources for Civil Defense:

Deliberation and evaluation (9 points): The average score (1) the number of deliberation committee members divided by adding points to the points assigned to each deliberation committee member, including points assigned to each deliberation committee member, and points assigned to each deliberation committee member, based on the following evaluation factors: (2) the comprehensive evaluation score of interview results is rated below 60 points or below, or evaluated as "n" (3) the evaluation factor that the comprehensive evaluation score of interview results is rated below 60 points or is evaluated as "n" (2) the evaluation factor that can evaluate the soundness of social life after discharge, such as the results of the identity investigation, etc.

4. Selection of successful examinees;

(a) Selection of “persons subject to selection” as the results of the comprehensive examination of those who have at least 40 per cent of the written examination results and at least 60 per cent of the average of all subjects, with a comprehensive examination result;

(b) the final successful candidates;