logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.10.16 2014가합2286
손해배상
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s claim against Defendant B, C, and D, and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)’s claim against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ status 1) G apartment located on the F ground of Sung-gu, Manam-si, Manam-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

2) The co-owner of the above apartment reconstruction project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”)

The promotion committee of G apartment reconstruction association was established pursuant to Article 13(2) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and was authorized to establish the promotion committee of G apartment reconstruction association on December 24, 2003. 2) After obtaining authorization for the establishment of the promotion committee, the promotion committee was not designated as an improvement zone, and on December 30, 201, the improvement plan and the designation of improvement zone was announced to promote the reconstruction project was combined with the “H apartment reconstruction association” around the apartment of this case, and in the process, the promotion committee of G apartment reconstruction association and the said H apartment reconstruction association were integrated into the promotion committee of G apartment reconstruction reconstruction association and the said H apartment reconstruction association were modified on April 9, 2012 (hereinafter “instant promotion committee”).

3) On September 25, 2013, the instant promotion committee obtained authorization to establish an association from the Sungnam market. Accordingly, the Plaintiff comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations relating to the duties of the promotion committee of this case. 4) Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D were the promoters of the instant promotion committee, and Defendant E is the father of the land, etc. of H apartment.

B. 1) The Defendants, etc., on December 18, 2012, at around 11:00, constitute the instant promotion committee meeting (hereinafter “instant meeting”).

In the event that a resolution to dismiss 28 promoters, including I, was passed at the above meeting, the office of the promotion committee of this case (hereinafter “instant office”) around 12:00 on the same day.

In order to move to another place, their body fightings such as entering the above office by asserting that they would take over the duties of the promotion committee of this case.

arrow