1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ status 1) The revised G Apartment-gu, Sungnam-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

2) The co-owner of the above apartment reconstruction project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”)

The promotion committee of G apartment reconstruction association was established pursuant to Article 13(2) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents. On December 24, 2003, the promotion committee was authorized to establish the promotion committee of G apartment reconstruction association. 2) After obtaining authorization for establishment, the promotion committee was not designated as a improvement zone, and on December 30, 201, the improvement plan and the designation of improvement zone was announced to promote the reconstruction project was combined with the “H apartment reconstruction association” around the apartment of this case, and in the process, the promotion committee of G apartment reconstruction association and the said H apartment reconstruction association were integrated into the promotion committee of G apartment reconstruction association and the said H apartment reconstruction association, and was approved for its modification on April 9, 2012 (hereinafter “instant promotion committee”).

3) On September 25, 2013, the instant promotion committee obtained authorization for the establishment of a partnership from the Sungnam City, and accordingly, J Housing Reconstruction and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “instant association”).

(4) The Plaintiff is the father of the owner of the H apartment’s land, etc., and the Defendants are or were the president or promoters of the instant promotion committee, the president or partnership of the instant association, or the former president of the instant association.

B. 1) Some members of the promotion committee of this case, around 11:00 on December 18, 2012, constituted a meeting of the promotion committee of this case (hereinafter “instant meeting”).

In the event that a resolution to dismiss 28 promoters, including Defendant B, was passed at the above meeting, the office of the promotion committee of this case (hereinafter “instant office”) around 12:00 on the same day.

(1) have been moved to another place.