logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.11.13 2012고정3050
무고
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant agreed to apply for the establishment of urban gas under the name of the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant’s transaction company “C” and to subscribe for an insurance policy to guarantee the payment of urban gas usage fees on behalf of the Defendant, but D failed to pay the gas usage fees, and D notified the Defendant of the claim for compensation for arrears in the payment of the gas usage fees and the notice of seizure, etc., and failed to communicate with D, so that D is not well-known, and the Defendant’s request for compensation for arrears in the payment of the gas usage fees, and the Defendant’s gas user fee payment guarantor was exempted from

Around November 2010, the Defendant submitted a written complaint to the civil petition office of the senior police station in Seoul, the Seoul, stating that “A person who is the Defendant’s complaint entered into a contract for the use of the main body and gas, and illegally stolen the name of the complainant as a joint surety and did not register the complainant as a joint surety and notify the complainant of this fact. In the end, the Defendant’s complaint would be punished if he/she entered into a contract for the use of the name of the complainant and entered into a fraudulent contract with the main body.” On December 20, 2010, the Defendant stated the supplementary statement at the above senior police station around December 20, 201, and “A person who is the Defendant’s complaint prepared the storage and contract while performing the interior construction work, and prepared the storage and contract as a joint surety using the low personal information specified in the contract, and entered into a contract for the use of the main body and gas with the main body.” In light of the contract, the Defendant’s seal and seal will not be punished as a document for forgery.”

However, the Defendant is unable to file an insurance policy with the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. on November 2009, when he/she intends to use urban gas by “C” with “C” operated by D around November 2009.

arrow