1. On August 17, 2015, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval for medical care rendered to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. On October 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “In the following subparagraphs”) and participated in the Ct Business that is conducted in Singapore from October 20, 2013, and at the office of Singapore (hereinafter referred to as “the local company of Singapore”) the Plaintiff has been in charge of the material-general and the support of electrical and electrical business as the head of materials in the office of Singapore.

On December 30, 2013, the hotel was found to have been employed in the hotel in front of the visit to the hotel at around 20:25 during the rest in the hotel, a hotel after leaving the hotel on December 30, 2013.

On December 31, 2013, after being transferred to a local hospital of Singapore, it was judged as “cerebrovascular cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral ion,” and received treatment on January 29, 2014 by transferring the same to a national university hospital of the Republic of Korea, and then received examination of “mathal iona, right mathal mathal mathy,” while being under rehabilitation treatment at the Syna Hospital of the Republic of Korea, Fa Hospital, etc. (hereinafter “the instant disease”).

The Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with respect to the injury and disease of this case to the Defendant.

On August 12, 2015, the Busan Occupational Disease Determination Committee rendered a judgment that “Admony’s disease is recognized as an injury or disease, but there was no sudden change in the work environment prior to the outbreak, and a short-term occupational division is not recognized as a long-term occupational course, and thus is low in relation to the duties of the superior branch. The symptoms occurring at this time, which are congenital diseases, were presumed to be the form of the birth of the mother-pathal disease. There is no proximate causal relation with the duties of the superior branch of the application.” Accordingly, on August 17, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the decision of non-approval (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

Although the plaintiff filed a request for examination against this, it was dismissed on December 29, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The instant disposition is lawful.