On May 13, 2019, the Defendant revoked the disposition of non-approval for medical care granted to the Plaintiff.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 29, 2017, when the Plaintiff entered into a labor contract with B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) and worked at the construction site of Ulsan Complex D (hereinafter “instant construction site”) that was implemented by C, the Plaintiff was employed below the work board while carrying out work on November 29, 2017. Emergency measures taken by the employees of the same staff who discovered the same, who did not look at a mental disorder and were sent back to the hospital with the symptoms of the Gutone and mara, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the disease of this case” (hereinafter “the disease of this case”).

B. The Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits regarding the instant injury and disease, but on May 13, 2019, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s work and the instant injury and disease based on the result of the deliberation by the Busan Occupational Disease Determination Committee as follows.

이 사건 상병 “뇌지주막하출혈, 수두증”은 인지된다는 의학적 소견이고, “신청인은 일용직 전기공으로 입선작업 수행하며 발ㅔ병 전 1주 동안의 총 업무시간은 57시간 15분, 발병 전 4주 동안의 1주당 평균 업무시간은 54시간 41분, 발병 전 12주 동안의 1주당 평균 업무시간은 51시간 18분이고 가중요인으로 육체적 강도가 높은 업무에 해당되어 이 사건 상병과 업무와의 상당인과관계가 인정된다”는 위원들의 소수 의견 있으나, “재해 직전 급격한 업무적 환경변화나 단기간의 업무적 증가 및 장기간의 업무적 과로가 인지되지 않고 고지혈증의 기존질환이 있는 점 등을 고려할 때 이 사건 상병과 업무와의 상당인과관계가 인정되지 않는다”는 것이 위원들 공동의 의견이다.

(c).