A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person in charge of the work in the “Dalmawon” in 201 Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Officetel 201, and the victim E (n.e., 56 years old) is a disabled person’s activity assistant dispatched for the head of the Mamawon, who is a class 1 disabled person at the time.

On September 20, 2017, at around 12:30 on September 20, 2017, the Defendant saw the gap between the victim and the victim who was taking care of food waste, and kidddly, kidddd the victim’s chest immediately below the chest of the victim, and kidddddly kiddddddly, the Defendant forced the victim to commit an indecent act by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The written statement by the police against E (the victim testified in this court that "the defendant was spared by the defendant when she discarded food waste on the side of the kitchen while she viewed the wall of the kitchen." At the time of the investigation by the investigative agency, the victim stated to the effect that "the defendant was spared by the defendant when she attempted to throw away food waste in the kitchen," and that "the defendant was spared by the defendant when she was spared by the defendant." It seems to be somewhat different in light of the fact that he testified about the direction of the victim at the time of the occurrence of the case, and that he testified in the court after a considerable time after the occurrence of the case.

The core contents of the victim's statement, namely, the victim's statement, when he thrown away food waste in front of scam, the defendant scamed, and scamed by the victim in the same way after scambling, and other detailed matters, namely, the following acts: (a) the defendant scam a coffee and scam for 20 years; (b) the victim's description of the situation at the time of the case where the defendant's face was red or should have been expressed is consistent.

In light of the details of the statement of damage, the method and attitude of the victim to testify, etc., the above facts charged.