logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고정1964
과실치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 2018, the Defendant, around 19:30 on May 13, 2018, at the Dong-gu Incheon Dong-gu B No. 201, had been moving to another place on the ground that people of Pyeongtaek Dong-dong have brought waste in front of their residence, and walked to it.

There was a possibility that people are different in terms of the goods, etc. on which the defendant was located as a house and a road that carries a person.

Nevertheless, the defendant, without due care, caused the food waste to be generated in the middle of the victim C (53 S, n, n) where the defendant flicked the food waste to the right edge of the victim C (53 S, n).

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salvatory typry, which requires treatment for about a week, due to such negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Two-time protocol of interrogation of the suspect of the police against the accused (including the cross-examination);

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The medical certificate [this case's statement is recognized that the victim gets out of the food waste tank on the day of this case (the victim's statement is generally reliable, and it does not seem to have been stated to be suitable for the food waste tank.) On the other hand, according to the defendant and the victim's common statement, the defendant and the victim stated that on the day of this case's day of this case's case's case's case's case's case's case that the defendant and the victim have a garbage in front of the house, the defendant did so due to the waste dumping problem, and the defendant did not want to go against anyone, but did not want to go against anyone, the fact that the person who did not throw a garbage at the site where the D elementary school was in a place where it was located at the time can be acknowledged that there was no other facts

Comprehensively taking account of these circumstances, the food waste booming around the victim’s growth has been from the Defendant, who had been booming with the chemical waste.

It is common sense to regard.

arrow