logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고단61
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around December 2009, the Defendant: (a) around December 2009, at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “Edo Council member” to manage employees as the head of the department; (b) the victim F was aware of the Defendant while working as an employee at the above Korea Council member; (c) the Defendant was working for the said Council member as the victim, including “The father of the Plaintiff was involved in G and H bill fraud, and his family members were unable to use the passbook or card in his own name, but only the real estate rent generated each month is the amount of money equal to the monthly real estate rent.”

On November 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s residence in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, stating that “The Defendant would obtain an officetel in Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by subtracting KRW 40 million from the deposit money that she lives in a place of residence of the victim.”

However, in fact, the defendant tried to use 40 million won for personal purposes even if he received 40 million won from the victim, and did not have the intention or ability to request the victim to use the dynamictel in Gangnam-gu Seoul as the whole.

Around November 14, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 40 million from the victim at the parking lot in the above residence.

"2014 Highest 299" listens to the defendant's opinion that there is a new officetel due to the expiration of the contract period of the officetel residing by the J of the victims of female-friendly job offering from the female-friendly job offering F, and in fact, the defendant deceivings the victim that the defendant would rent the officetel as a collateral for collateral on deposit with the victim without an officetel leased as a monthly rent.

The Defendant around March 2012, at the “E” hospital, the Defendant’s workplace located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, the Defendant “E” for the victim’s “Wtel in Gangnam-gu, Seoul.”

arrow