logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고단2173
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 2173]

1. Around January 2, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would transfer a vehicle to the victim E, who is a motor vehicle exporter, by purchasing the vehicle in his/her own name,” at the office of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D company office, No. 512, Geumcheon-gu.

However, even if the defendant received the above money, he did not intend to purchase the vehicle and deliver it to the victim.

The first charge is premised on the fact that the defendant and the victim export the vehicle, but it is not sufficient to recognize the legal statement of the witness E and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, and it was deleted because this part does not affect the establishment of the crime.

On February 2, 2012, the Defendant acquired 16.9 million won from the victim to the single bank account (F) account under the name of the Defendant from the victim for the purchase of the vehicle.

2. The accused is a person engaging in driving a shower car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Road Traffic Act, Road Traffic Act, Road Traffic Act, and Road Traffic Act;

On January 28, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 0.206% with alcohol concentration of 0.206% on blood alcohol level around 21:05, and turned the front intersection of the sloping apartment in the north-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, into the sloping apartment at a speed of about 30km from the sloping elementary school to the sloping apartment at a speed of 30km.

At the time, there is a night and a place where the center line of the yellow-ray is installed, so there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving service to thoroughly turn off the front line and safely bypass the tea line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so, is negligent by overpassing the central line, and the part on the left side of the IF car driven by the victim H(34 years old) who is in the atmosphere signal at the first lane of the opposite part.

arrow