beta
Text
1. Defendant A’s fine of 4,00,000 won, Defendant C’s fine of 2,50,000 won, Defendant B, D, E, F, and G respectively. 2,00 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the head of the branch of the I branch of the Korea Democratic Trade Union under the General Federation of the Korean Democratic Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as the "Private Union"), and Defendant B is the public relations director of the above J branch, Defendant D is the head of the secretariat of the I regional headquarters of the Civil Union, Defendant C is the head of the two bureau of the I regional headquarters of the Civil Union, Defendant C is the head of the two bureau of the I regional headquarters of the Civil Union, and Defendant A, etc. is the members of the I branch of the cargo solidarity
K Co., Ltd. has entered into a transport contract with L Co., Ltd. and transported vehicles produced in I, and the said L Co., Ltd. has entered into an entrustment contract with M, N,O, P, etc. (hereinafter “each transport company of this case”) and had the said four companies transport the vehicles. The members of the said I branch of the said I branch of the said Cargo Co., Ltd shall transport the vehicles produced in K I branch of the transport company of this case to the whole country as the borrower who entered into the respective transport company of this case.
On March 26, 2016, the Defendants gathered with members, including K Co., Ltd., and L Co., Ltd., including I Branch Q, to interfere with the withdrawal of replaced vehicles in order to accomplish the assertion of opposition to the reduction of transportation charges by 6.5% on the grounds of the reduction of the value of the current category.
피고인들은 2016. 3. 28. 16:25 경부터 같은 날 16:50 경까지 R에 있는 K I 공장( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 공장’ 이라 한다 )에서, 위 화물연대 I 지부장 Q 등 회원들과 함께 팔짱을 끼는 등의 방법으로 차량 운송을 위해 출차하는 S 등 L 주식회사가 대체 투입한 화물차 9대의 앞을 가로막았다( 위와 같이 운송료 인하 반대를 주장하면서 이 사건 공장에서의 출차를 막는 집회를 이하 ‘ 이 사건 집회’ 라 한다). 이로써 피고인들은 위 화물연대 I 지부장 Q 등 회원들과 공모하여 위력으로 L 주식회사의 차량 운송 업무와 K 주식회사의 차량 출고 업무를 방해하였다.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of Defendant A, B, D, E, F, and G (Defendant D and G are 7.