logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.28 2013고정5018
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 22, 2013, around 00:30 on June 22, 2013, the Defendant visited the Defendant with the criminal charge, along with the above B, about the clock B, who was driven around the crosswalk prior to the Seoul Seongbuk Police Station.

The above B was considered by the assistant investigator C, who was in charge of the following: (a) “I would have caused the death of this person, and would have caused the death of this person,” and “I would have demanded the delivery thereof.”

The defendant gives a warning to the investigator in charge of the investigator in charge, "I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am

Nevertheless, at around 00:50 on the same day, the investigator in charge had been seated in the vacant space of the investigator, and had the investigator in charge, "I am saw that I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am sat, I am d

2. At around 02:30 of the same day, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender under the above suspicion at the Seongbuk Police Station and the watchkeeping room, and imprisoned the police officer, etc. in the atmosphere in the waiting room, and cannot undergo investigation for his/her safety, etc., and contacted his/her parents and transferred his/her duties to the police officer, etc., the Defendant assaulted the police officer, etc., who was in charge of the performance of official duties, at the time when he/she saws the inside of the slope C, who was the investigator in charge, twice as he/she flabs, and went beyond his/her control with his/her parents.

In this respect, the police officer's legitimate performance of duties was hindered.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written Statements in Category C, D, E, and B.

arrow