logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.06 2018고정596
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. No person charged with a charge shall obtain a license for passenger transport business by unlawful means;

Nevertheless, on November 7, 2017, the Defendant obtained a private taxi license with the authorization of acquisition of a private taxi license on November 13, 2017 after obtaining the authorization of acquisition of a private taxi license from the public official E working-level in charge, with the knowledge that only a person who has experienced an accident within three years at the time of applying for the authorization of transfer of a private taxi license in the name of D from the public official E- working-level in charge, who was aware of the fact that he/she was the perpetrator at the road at the entrance of the Mamp Tunnelsn at around September 28, 2017.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the Defendant’s legal statement, E-written statement, written authorization of transfer of private taxi transport business, written authorization of transfer of private taxi transport business, written application for authorization of transfer of private taxi transport business, suspect A driving experience certificate, written application for verification of authenticity of accidentless driving experience certificate, investigation report (the contents of telephone communications with public official who filed an accusation in Young City) is acknowledged as follows.

1) The Defendant caused a traffic accident on September 28, 2017, and was treated as a comprehensive insurance.

Accordingly, on January 13, 2018, the Defendant received a penalty notice regarding the foregoing traffic accident, and received a disposition that has no public prosecution right as to the above traffic accident on March 8, 2018.

2) On November 6, 2017, the Defendant was issued with a driving experience certificate at the Dong-dong Police Station in Chungcheongnam-dong, Dong-dong, 2017, and the foregoing traffic accident was not indicated.

On November 7, 2017, the Defendant applied for the approval of the transfer of private taxi transport business to obtain the transfer of private taxi transport business from D on November 7, 2017, and submitted a certificate of work experience for private taxi transport business.

In addition to the submission of a certificate of work experience in an accident-free driving, the Defendant did not state his/her work experience in the application (at least there was no challenge to state) and the public official in charge did not ask him/her.

The public official in charge of viewing shall be the defendant at the police station of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

arrow