logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2021.02.17 2020고단2965
특수공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 19, 2020, the Defendant damaged special public goods: (a) on September 11:10, 2020, the police officers belonging to the Seo-gu North Police Station located in the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seo-gu, in order to set a DNA car in front of the vehicle of the Defendant, and was dispatched after receiving a report of suspicion of drinking while driving the vehicle; (b) the police officers belonging to the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the vehicle of the Defendant; and (c) after the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the vehicle of the Defendant, the Defendant continued to drive the vehicle in front of the vehicle of the latter part of the E Patrol with the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the vehicle of the latter part, and continued to drive the vehicle, and received the front part of the F Patrol with the rear part of the latter part.

Accordingly, the Defendant, carrying dangerous articles and destroyed E patrol cars and 673,011 won for repair costs, thereby impairing the utility of articles used by public offices.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking), the Defendant was arrested as an offender from damage to special public goods on September 19, 2020 and was brought in to the H district of the Y district of the Y district of the Y police station in the Y district of the Yanananan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Yan-si on September 19, 2020, and was driven under the influence of alcohol by a police official I, snickly, snickly,

There was a reasonable reason to determine a person, and it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the breath in three times between about 20 minutes.

The defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds by refusing to take a bath and to take a measurement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A report on internal investigation (data for H patrols and video records submitted by a police officer in mobilization);

1. Statement report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in the main place, investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver who is placed in the main place), and notification of the results of

1. Written estimate of repair costs;

1. On-site photographs (e.g., shock of patrols and photographs refusing to measure drinking);

arrow