A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 9. 6. 23:40경 광주 동구 C에 있는 D식당에서, E, F을 폭행하던 중, ‘행패를 부린다.‘는 112 신고를 받고 현장 출동한 광주동부경찰서 G지구대 경위인 피해자 H(52세)이 피고인을 제지하려고 하자 “내가 누군지 아느냐 개새끼야. 내가 동부서 A경감인데 너 말똥 하나지 이 새끼야. 순찰차 한 대 더 불러라. 내가 몇 살 인줄 아냐, 이런 개새끼야. 너는 상사도 몰라보냐 이 호로새끼야. 빨리 전화해 봐라”고 큰 소리치며 오른 주먹으로 피해자의 왼쪽 귓등을 1회 때리고 멱살을 잡아 흔들고 근무복 조끼를 잡아당겨 폭행하였다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers' investigation duties, and at the same time, the victim was forced to face a bad faith in need of medical treatment for about one week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on commission;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties (In June to April), the basic area (in June to April) of Article 1 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties (in case of coercion of Performance of Duties) is that the defendant, while misrepresenting the police officer, committed an assault against the police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report while making a failure at the restaurant, and the situation of the crime is very heavy, together with the fact that the police officer was injured by the victim police officer, the degree of injury of the victim police officer, the fact that the

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.