1. The Defendant’s disposition of paying bereaved family’s compensation against the Plaintiff on April 14, 2014 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Details of the disposition

The deceased B(hereinafter referred to as the "the deceased") passed the law official public bond examination in 2001 and was appointed as the court official in 2002, and began to work in the Ulsan District Court from July 1, 2002.

From July 11, 2008, the deceased started to work at C court. On July 11, 201, the deceased issued a civil execution and a civil preservation practice officer of C court, and received an order on July 11, 201, in charge of additional distribution, such as payment entrustment, etc., one half year, and served as a civil application and a first rehabilitation group reading officer on January 11, 2013, and from July 11, 2013, the deceased was in charge of receiving individual debtor rehabilitation certification.

On October 7, 2013, the Deceased promoted to Grade VII.

On December 6, 2013, the Deceased was discharged from work until 22:20 on Friday.

Around 8:00 on the following day, the deceased’s friendship was broken, but reported to 119, who did not occur, and the deceased was sent to the Ganbuk University Hospital, but was determined to have died.

According to the body autopsy report on the deceased, the person in direct possession of the deceased is written respectively as a resistant death, an intermediary in the middle line funeral, and the preceding deather in the middle line as a sulphical sulphical sulphical sulphical heart disease (pulphical sulphical sulphical sulphical re

On February 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for a survivor pension by asserting that the deceased died of a disease due to official duties pursuant to Article 56(1)3 of the Public Officials Pension Act, as a wife of the deceased. However, on April 14, 2014, the Defendant issued a survivor pension site payment disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that it cannot be deemed that the deceased died of a disease due to official duties.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate as a whole, without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, Gap's evidence No. 11-12, Gap's evidence No. 13, and the whole purport of the pleading, and mental and physical stress suffered from excessive work and civil petitioner's response,

The defendant is proper for the deceased's work.