The sentence against the accused shall be 2,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant attended the process of integrating D University (hereinafter “D”) graduate schools and worked as a researcher at the “E Research Institute” affiliated with the said University. From March 2010 to April 201, the victim F was employed as a DNA special professor, and was affiliated with the “G Team” at which the head of the team was assigned, and carried out H-related research under the direction of the victim.

In fact, the study on H is related to the subjects that found the victim's technology to control the phenomenon in which the fratosiss grow during the U.S. I University doctorate course in around 2007 and completed a basic concept of the terms and conditions necessary for the fratization growth. This idea is not only based on the victim's previous research findings, but also on the basis of the victim's previous research findings. After the victim's return to Korea, the victim was employed as a special teaching professor at the same university J professors and K University (K; hereinafter "K"), and the defendant took overall control of the above research process with the support of L professors at the same university and K University (K; hereinafter "K"), and the defendant took over specific instructions and test conditions from the victim in the process and took part in the research using the relevant equipment and took part in the analysis of the results in the process, which

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) decided to publish a thesis (hereinafter “the instant thesis”) on the “N” page (hereinafter “N”) that is a specialized scientific journal; (b) was aware of the fact that the Defendant did not register himself/herself as a joint author; and (c) was aware of the fact that he/she designated him/herself as a subject of “private learning”; (d) asserted that the Defendant was aware of the fact that he/she discovered and claimed an important result through his/her own creative experiment regardless of the victim’s own creative experiment in the instant research process; and (e) asserted that the Defendant was aware of the fact that he/she did not register himself/herself as a joint author.