logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.09.18 2014고단2627
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 7, 2014, from around 21:30 to 23:20, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) returned home without calculating the drinking value by the above-mentioned male and female in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City’s “Ecafeteria”; and (b) requested the above victim to pay KRW 42,000 to the Defendant without calculating the drinking value; (c) the Defendant paid KRW 39,000,000, which is a part of the above, demanded the Defendant to prepare a receipt; (d) further, the Defendant demanded the Defendant to enter the above restaurant, and the victim, who is likely to interfere with the restaurant business, requested the Defendant to leave the above restaurant; and (d) the victim, who did not comply with the request, demanded the Defendant to have the above restaurant enter the restaurant, thereby interfering with the Defendant’s business by force. However, the Defendant did not comply with the request, “A person who was able to immediately open the restaurant and have his/her opening the restaurant, thereby interfering with his/her funeral service.”

2. On August 7, 2014, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 23:20 on August 7, 2014, the Defendant expressed about 30 minutes for police officers belonging to the F District Unit of the Seoul Nowon Police Station, who called “the Defendant interfered with his duties as described in paragraph (1).” However, the Defendant informed the Defendant of the doctrine that he would arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender who interfered with his duties because he did not speak to the police officer, and did not respond to the doctrine, and then sent the Defendant’s arms to the Defendant, “A person who gets in the restaurant,” who gets in his arms and gets in the restaurant, she sees “A”, the circumstances leading up to drinking, the circumstances leading up to drinking, and the circumstances leading up to drinking, and the following Hah’s qui, who continued to walk the Defendant’s Hah to the port by assaulting it to the instant restaurant.

In this respect.

arrow