The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (the fact-finding and the misapprehension of legal principles) of the accident in this case occurred from the victim E at will busheshes oil in a long term, without the defendant's instruction, and the defendant provided sufficient safety education to the ordinary victim, etc., and the defendant was right to correct the oil in preparation process even in relation to camping, so the defendant was found guilty of the facts charged in this case without any negligence on the accident in this case, and the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case

2. The judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court: ① the defendant did not put oil to a stude while taking overall control of the camping event; ② ordered the victim's subordinate employee, to a stude in a stude; ② the accident of this case where the victim bushes oil to a bushee in a bushee, which was busheed by the oil, was caused by the victim's body while she was bushesing the oil to a bushee in a bushee in a bushee, and ③ according to the witness F's statement employed in D, the defendant used a more safe method, such as putting oil to a bushee in the past, without directly busheeting the oil, and putting it to an investigative agency; on the day of the accident of this case, the defendant's instructions were made to bushed the oil to the victim at his discretion, but the defendant did not put it to a bushee to the victim's body.