1. The Defendants shall pay to the Plaintiff each corresponding amount and each corresponding amount indicated in the “recognized Amount” list in attached Form 2.

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around December 2013, a person under whose name the person under whose name the deposit passbook was given to Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I refers to the payment of money in return for the lending of the deposit passbook. The remaining Defendants sent the deposit passbook, etc. to the other Defendants, and made the loan available when notifying the account password.

Accordingly, the Defendants believed the horses of those names in distressed, and, around November 2013 through December 2, 2013, sent the false names to each of the Defendant’s deposit passbooks, cash cards, and bank password information under the name of each of the Defendant.

B. On December 16, 2013, the Plaintiff informed the Plaintiff’s bank, account number, security card number, account password, and other personal information of the Plaintiff’s non-indicteds at the end of his/her false statement, stating that “The Plaintiff shall investigate a criminal case working in the Seoul Local Police Agency. The circumstances leading up to the fraud crime, which led to the withdrawal of a complaint. As bank transaction information is exposed to the defraudeds, it is necessary to prevent the leakage of information by putting the security level on the part of the defraudeds.”

C. From December 16, 2013 to December 18, 2013, using the Plaintiff’s personal information identified as above, the name-free person transferred each of the corresponding amounts indicated in the “request Amount” column in the attached Table 2 to the Plaintiff’s respective deposit accounts of the Plaintiff’s bank account (Account Number T) and the new bank account (U) through several times during the period from December 16, 2013 to December 18, 2013, and then withdrawn and acquired it.

[Ground of recognition] Defendant B, C, L, D, M, and Q: The remaining Defendants except the aforementioned Defendants as the confession deemed to have been made: The entries in the evidence Nos. 1 through 6; the inquiry results on the chief of the station having jurisdiction over the strike of this court; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence and scope of liability for damages;

A. In the case of joint tort under Article 760 of the Civil Code, one of the persons who suffered the liability for damages jointly causing damages to another person, a public invitation or joint participation among the actors.