logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.01.14 2015고단2634
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2012, the Defendant, at the victim B’s house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul, planned the victim to check “D” at the time of raising home games.

Since temples are non-profit organizations, they shall not pay taxes.

Using this point, it is scheduled to establish a card merchant in the name of "D" and pay a credit card and receive a loan from the relevant card company.

The principal shall also be paid with the loan of the fund.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant was a person with bad credit standing at the time, and the Defendant was planning to use the said money for personal purposes, such as living expenses, other than business funds, for the purpose of personal use, and thus, there was no intention or ability to repay the said money even if the Defendant received the said money from the victim.

Nevertheless, from April 4, 2012 to July 2, 2012, the Defendant received a total of KRW 27,770,000 from the injured party as a project fund for “a person who has no seat in a card” four times.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On December 11, 2013, the Defendant against the victim E is a non-profit organization and does not pay taxes to the victim E in the “D”, which is a temple run by the Defendant, who is the inspector of Gyeyang-gu F lending 201 and 201, Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

Using this point, the card merchant is opened in the name of "D" and the card merchant is settled with the credit card, and the card's "tin-time" business is being loaned by the card company.

The principal shall also be paid with the loan of the fund.

“A false statement was made,” and a victim’s cell phone was sent by affixing a photograph of the card sales slip which arbitrarily changed the date of settlement in order to know the victim’s awareness.

However, the defendant was the bad credit holder at the time.

arrow