beta
Text
1. The Defendant: 28,470,562 won to Plaintiff A and 3.2% per annum from October 12, 2012 to January 9, 2015; and
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability to pay insurance proceeds;
A. The facts of recognition 1) D is a E-vehicle under the influence of alcohol on November 4, 2009 at around 20:25, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.223%. (hereinafter “accidented vehicle”).
) A driver, while driving his vehicle and driving his vehicle, found that he was negligent in neglecting the duty of the front line of the Nakdongwon center in front of the Jinwon center in front of the Jinwon center in Kimpo-si, which was in front of the fourth-lane road in front of the city of Jinpo-si, and was in front of the road in front of the same direction while he was negligent in neglecting the duty of the front line, and was rapidly operated, but did not stop, and the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the accident, and continued to collision with the signal apparatus installed on the right side of the road in front of the vehicle in front of the accident. Accordingly, the plaintiff who was on board the front line of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in question sustained the injury, such as a thalle, etc. on the left side of the vehicle in front of the
(2) Plaintiff B and C are the children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract for H containing a special agreement on coverage with the content of compensation as stipulated in the terms and conditions in a case where there is a person liable to compensate for the loss incurred when the insured died or died of an accident caused by an non-insurance motor vehicle within the limit of KRW 200 million between Plaintiff A and Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff A is the insured of the said non-insurance special agreement.
In addition, with respect to the vehicle involved in the accident at the time of the accident, only liability insurance contract was concluded with a lot damage insurance company.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above findings of the determination, since the vehicle involved in the accident inflicted on the Plaintiff A falls under the non-life insurance that does not apply to the personal compensation II, the Defendant is guaranteed the above non-life insurance in relation to the accident in this case.