1. The Defendant’s KRW 46,03,820 as well as 3.1% per annum from February 14, 2013 to May 26, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability to pay insurance proceeds;

A. The facts of recognition 1) B are as follows: B around 14:00 on October 13, 201: (a) C Track (hereinafter “Hack”)

) A driver, while driving a vehicle, in violation of the left-hand turn from the shooting distance front of the rooftop railway path in the Gunsan-si situation zone, to the front of the amendment to the left-hand turn. A driver, who was directly engaged in the normal signal from the front side of the e-mail distance to the normal signal from the e-mail side of the e-mail distance to the normal signal, is the Plaintiff’s driver’s d

) The left side part of the vehicle’s front part was shocked with the front right side of the vehicle’s front side (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s satisfying of the left-hand satisfy, the left-hand satisfying of satisfy, the left-hand satisfying of satisfy, the right-hand satfying of satisfy, the left-hand satisfying of sat

3) As to the Plaintiff’s automobile, when the insured was injured by an accident that occurred due to an uninsurance motor vehicle, the Plaintiff and the Defendant as the insured as to the Plaintiff’s automobile, the terms and conditions for the damage incurred therefrom (hereinafter “instant terms and conditions”).

A) An automobile comprehensive insurance contract, including a non-life insurance security agreement, that provides for indemnity as prescribed in the terms and conditions of the instant automobile insurance contract, was concluded. The main content of the instant terms and conditions is as shown in the attached Form 1. 4) The automobile constitutes an non-insurance automobile under the instant terms and conditions.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1, 4, 10 evidence, Eul 3, 10 evidence (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the Plaintiff suffered injury due to the instant accident that occurred by a non-insured automobile, and thus, the Defendant, as an insurer, is obliged to pay the Plaintiff insurance proceeds pursuant to the non-insured injury security special agreement.

C. The judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of comparative negligence is that the Defendant did not neglect the front-down of the Plaintiff, since the vehicle is a stude, which is a farming machine.