A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, a group of organized violence crime, was an employee of the “Meo-gu Franchim wave,” and was aware of the victim D who purchased damage caused by C having been working as a group of organized organized members on January 2014, with the introduction of the victim D, and had been aware of the fact that the damaged liquid buyers could easily gain large profits, used the mobilization of organized violent ships to bring about disputes over the right of mutual protection against the said victims D, etc.

On December 2, 2014, the Defendant called the victim D by phoneing the victim D on December 2, 2014, and received taxes at the location of the Samsung Electronic Service Center which is newly opened at the same time. To conduct business, it threatens to deposit KRW 3 million each month at the location of the Samsung Electronic Service Center at the same time. In order to purchase the victim E at the same time at the same time with the victim’s trade irregular office located at the same time in the middle of the Dong-dong-dong Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, demanding payment of KRW 300,000 won each month for the damage to the same business, without responding to such demand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Protocols concerning the examination of suspects 1 and 2 times with regard to D;

1. Protocols concerning the examination of suspects 1 and 2 times with regard to D;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Each police statement of E/F (the above evidence) can be fully acknowledged as charged of the instant case according to the above evidence.

On the other hand, the witness E, D, and F made a statement that is not consistent with the facts charged in this court.

It is written to an investigation agency in accordance with the basic principles of criminal procedure, such as trial-oriented principle and substantial direct deliberation principle.