1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is well-known.

On September 25, 2013, 2013, a foreigner of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “C-3”)’s nationality, who entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on September 1, 2013, and stayed in the Republic of Korea, filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on September 25, 2013, when the period of sojourn expires ( September

B. On June 9, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer persecution” as a refugee requirement under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was known from the age of 17 to the Plaintiff, and was discovered during the process of having sexual intercourse with a female-friendly Gu at a school dormitory around 2008 and became due to the detection of the Plaintiff’s assertion.

The school authorities report the plaintiff to the police as the business speech to the police and communicate to the police.

The authorities became aware of the fact that the plaintiff was Lebi.

Therefore, while the plaintiff was hidden in Cambodia's mother's house due to fear of detection by investigative agencies, he was found to have sexual intercourse with a new female-friendly district and was found by all the groups and was subject to tracking of police.

Since then, the plaintiff was born to the E-Ma-gu house, and was born to Korea with the help of E-Ma-Ma.

U.S.C.

In this regard, the pressure, social discrimination and threat of the authorities with regard to same-sexs are becoming serious.

Therefore, even though the Plaintiff’s status as a member of a social group or as a refugee who is likely to be stuffed on the grounds of political opinions, the instant disposition taken by the Defendant on a different premise is unlawful.

(b) The definitions of terms used in this Act shall be as follows:

1. “Refugee” is a race, ..