1. The part of the claim for confirmation in the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims against the defendant B organization and the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ relevant Defendant B organization is an organization established by G Co., Ltd. to train and support candidates for the chairperson of a trade union. The Plaintiff is a member dismissed on August 21, 2018, who joined the Defendant B organization around September 2015.

In Defendant B’s organization, Defendant C is the chairman, Defendant D is the general affairs, and Defendant E and F is the members.

B. On August 21, 2018, the Defendant B’s organization, which made a resolution on the amendment of its bylaws and the expulsion of the Plaintiff, adopted a resolution on the amendment of its bylaws by holding a meeting of the operating staff, and the major contents are as shown in the attached Form.

(2) On the other hand, the Defendant B’s organization notified the Plaintiff of the fact of expulsion as text messages on August 23, 2018 after the Plaintiff passed a resolution on the expulsion of the Plaintiff at the meeting of the said operating group.

(hereinafter “instant expulsion”). C.

Defendant C, on April 6, 2018, posted a letter to Defendant C, D, E, and F, Defendant C, on April 6, 2018, in which the members of Defendant B were admitted, posted a letter to “I are able to believe political gatherings at all times, and those who do not do so. It is necessary to do so at all times to harm the atmosphere that would be consistent with the important time now.” Defendant D, “(2) on April 17, 2018, took advantage of the repaired company crisis, and several members of the B organization subscribed to a place that does not conform to the purport of the principal at the time of their accession, and posted a meeting that would be able to interfere with the foundation of the B organization and make it difficult to understand that Defendant D had been able to take advantage of the general rule by taking advantage of how I would imprecilate the foundation of the B organization, despite having been able to do so.”

3. Defendant E, on April 19, 2018, considered the weight of the horses in the company atmosphere, as the horses that were not confirmed, are prone as they are too flooded.