logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.08.27 2015고정222
국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From May 2012 to December 31, 2012, the Defendant changed the form and quality of land by raising a size of approximately KRW 5,490 square meters, upon obtaining permission for development activities for the creation of superior farmland on the 13 lots in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gu, Hongcheon-gu, Hongcheon-gu, Hongcheon-gu, Hongcheon-gun.

However, on April 22, 2014, the Defendant failed to complete construction until the expiration of the project permission period.

The written indictment states, “A performance guarantee of KRW 17.6 million shall not be deposited in the course of development activities for the creation of good farmland,” but the written indictment states only that the construction was not completed until the period of permission for development activities as of April 22, 2014 expires, and the order to reinstate as of July 22, 2014 appears to be on the extension line of the order to reinstate as of April 22, 2014. As such, the written indictment appears to be written in error.

shall be deleted, and shall be deleted.

Accordingly, the Defendant from the Hongcheon-gun Office on April 22, 2014 and 2014

7. On two occasions on August 22, 201, an order to reinstate was issued on or before August 4, 2014 but did not comply with the said order without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement on P;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accusation and public notice;

1. Article 142 of the relevant Act and Articles 133 (1) and 5-2 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has not restored to the original state until now, and the defendant has been punished several times due to various administrative violations such as Housing Construction Promotion Act, Mountainous Districts Management Act, Building Act, Farmland Act, Housing Construction Promotion Act, etc. before committing the instant crime, and the age of the defendant.

arrow