logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.07.02 2015고단263
국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반
Text

1. The defendant is not guilty. 2. The defendant will notify the defendant of the summary of the judgment.

Reasons

1. A person charged with development activities shall obtain permission for development activities or permission for alteration from the relevant administrative agency, and a person who engages in development activities without obtaining permission shall comply with an order for corrective measures issued by the relevant administrative agency;

Nevertheless, around April 2013, the Defendant constructed a camping site in Chuncheon-si B, B without permission for development activities in the Chuncheon-si market, and issued an order to reinstate from November 3, 2014 to November 30, 2014, but failed to comply with the order without justifiable grounds.

2. The following facts are acknowledged in full view of C’s voluntary statement as of June 2, 2015, C’s statement of business trip name as of June 2, 2015, C’s statement of business trip name as of each business trip name as of June 2, 2015, and statement of

A. On October 30, 2014, C received a public interest report on the creation of an illegal camping site in Chuncheon-si B (hereinafter “instant land”) and confirmed that E (the Defendant’s wife) posted a business trip to the instant land on October 30, 2014 without obtaining permission for development activities, and built a camping site on each of the instant land F and G land without obtaining permission for development activities.

B. Accordingly, on November 3, 2014, the Chuncheon market sent to E a letter of the title “the restoration to the original state of tort” (H camping). The key contents are as follows.

He/she has violated Article 56 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”) and Article 34 of the Farmland Act without obtaining permission to engage in development activities, and illegally uses the farmland for other purposes (coverfing). Thus, he/she has violated the said Act and subordinate statutes, and thus, has to restore the farmland to the original state by November 30, 2014.

C. On December 4, 2014 and January 7, 2015, C inspected the business trip on the instant land and confirmed whether the aforementioned order to reinstate was implemented, and as a result, only a part of the building was removed, and the reinstatement was not completely performed.

3...

arrow