A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, along with B, C, and D, provided a game machine, etc. to the actual operator of the above entertainment room in Daegu Dong-gu E and 2 from Jun. 2015 to Oct. 20 of the same year; D, the actual operator of the above entertainment room; and the Defendant, as the president of the so-called B, offered to manage customers such as handling the so-called “the fact”; C, and B, as the so-called B, offered an unspecified number of customers with a free right to use, stating the points obtained by the customers, and exchanged cash free of charge through the exchange of the above entertainment room.

Accordingly, the defendant exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products in collusion with B, C, and D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect by the prosecution against the defendant, D, C, or B;

1. Statement made by each prosecution with respect to G and H;

1. Management ledger;

1. On-site photographs and closure photographs of dynamics;

1. Application of each statute of the judgment;

1. The crime of this case committed under Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Selection and Punishment of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the reason for sentencing a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor is a highly harmful crime, such as promoting an excessive speculative spirit and hindering sound labor consciousness. The defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had been punished several times, including the same kind of punishment, in that he/she committed the crime of this case.

On the other hand, in consideration of the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake and that the defendant did not lead the crime of this case, it is decided as per the disposition.