logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.24 2016고단714
상습절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 1979, the Defendant was subject to a disposition to transfer it to the Family Court for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on April 28, 1982; on November 3, 1982, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and two years of suspension of execution; on September 3, 1982, he was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months at night at the Seoul Northern District Court; on September 26, 1986, one year and six months at the Seoul Central District Court for larceny; on October 16, 1991, one year and six months; on July 21, 198, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months at the same court on July 21, 198; on July 8, 2000, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Central District Court on June 16, 200, respectively; and on June 23, 2006>

On January 13, 2016, around 21:20 on January 13, 2016, the Defendant, as the victim’s “E” in the Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Operation of the Victim D, pretended to be the customer who purchased the hacker, and used the gap in which the victim found the hacker and neglected surveillance, she placed one gold bar (14K and male) equivalent to 400,000 won in the market price of the victim’s possession displayed in the display stand.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Previous convictions: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, inquiry into confinement, search of persons subject to investigation, report on investigation (related to criminal history of a suspect and period of repeated crime), investigation report (Attachment to a suspect A's judgment), and attached data;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The recognition of dampness [the defendant and his defense counsel] in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the same kind of crimes committed several times, etc. in the judgment;

arrow