logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.03.20 2015고합25
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 26, 1996, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Cheongju District Court on September 2, 1998, and was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the above crime at the Daejeon District Court on September 2, 1998, and on August 6, 2010, Cheongju District Court sentenced one year and six months of suspension of execution and three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Cheongju District Court on April 8, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence on July 24, 2012

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 09:20 on January 8, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (Habitually Injury by Deadly Injury) (hereinafter referred to as “A”), at the “E cafeteria” restaurant operated by Sejong Special Self-Governing City (hereinafter “E”), ordered the State and small-scale one disease, and subsequently, called the victim’s contact address and subsequently, made a call later. The victim did not want to talk with the Defendant, and the victim did not want to do so, but did so, she was off, she was off, and she was off, she was off, and she did so, she did not want to do so, she was off, she was off, and she did so, she was off, and she was at the place where she was headed of the victim, and she was at the place where she was faced with the victim’s body, and she was at the place where she was faced with the victim’s body.

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual collective action, destruction of deadly weapons, etc.) caused damage to the victim’s property and its utility in a way that the steel maker, which is a dangerous object, was collected from the glass door of the E cafeteria, owned by the victim D, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of the said Article, was loaded in the glass door of the E cafeteria, which is the dangerous object as stated in paragraph (1), thereby shouldering the market price of 80 thousand won

3. Obstruction of operations;

arrow