Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a c spawn spawn spawn.

On July 26, 2014, at around 06:06, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle, and again returned to the left at the entrance of the new luminous village at the entrance of the new luminous village.

Since there is a tri-type intersection where no signal, etc. is installed, when a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle intends to make a left-hand turn at the intersection where traffic is not controlled, there was a duty of care to yield the course of the vehicle if there is another motor vehicle that intends to proceed straight or make a right-hand.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left without neglecting this, and went to the left from the left side of the said cargo vehicle to the right side of the escot (ECOTRT) of the victim D (ECOTRT) driven by the two-lanes at the right side of the said cargo vehicle on the right side of the escot (ECOTRT) 110 driver's length of the said cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered double damage to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, and caused the death of the victim due to the cardiopulmonary suspension, which caused the injury to the two parts at the Naju General Hospital located in Sinsan-ro 5419 on the same day at around 11:51 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act can be deemed to have been partially negligent even if the victim did not temporarily stop at the intersection. The defendant agreed with the victim's bereaved family members, and the above bereaved family members do not want the defendant's punishment, and the defendant's vehicle is covered by the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance and thus will be somewhat helpful for the recovery of damage suffered by the above bereaved family members.